Navigator :

§ 316(b) Compliance

Impacts and Costs of Cooling Systems Conversion: Once-through to Closed-cycle

ASA prepared feasibility evaluations for several facilities in Illinois, Florida, New Hampshire, Delaware, North Dakota, and Indiana. ASA’s evaluations have two key features: the evaluations are site specific, and they are performed in coordination with biologists and economists.

Learn More

E.F. Barrett Power Station §316(b) SPDES Permitting & SEQR Analysis

As part of SPDES permitting, ASA assisted National Grid in the evaluation of BTA alternatives for minimizing the environmental effects of Barrett’s CWIS and thermal discharge on receiving waters of Hempstead Bay.

Learn More

§ 316(b) Application Requirements for Vistra Cooling Lake and Ohio River Facilities

ASA identified, implement, and prepare the field studies and § 122.21(r) reports for seven Dynegy facilities located on Illinois cooling lakes and the Ohio River. Serving as the prime contractor, ASA assisted Dynegy in formulating an approach strategy to completing the (r)-reports and was responsible for the quality and timely completion of several studies and reports required under the § 316(b) Rule.

Learn More